MEDIATING INFLUENCE OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE IN AFFILIATION AMONGST CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR.

Abstract

The variable corporate social responsibility (CSR) arose one of the significant variable for research. Though, how corporate social responsibility (CSR) impacts organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) required research to understand. With support stakeholder theory, the current study inspects corporate social responsibility (CSR) impact organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) as well as mediates two determinants of organizational justice i.e. distributive justice (DJ), procedural justice (PJ), data collected from 173 individuals in response to the invitation (i.e.43.25% response rate) received in six weeks period from different occupation employee of the corporate offices of Pakistan. Results suggested, corporate social responsibility (CSR) predict organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), corporate social responsibility (CSR) support distributive justice (DJ), corporate social responsibility (CSR) positive impacts procedural justice (PJ), distributive justice (DJ) positively impacts organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and procedural justice did not support on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). However, mediation part of distributive justice (DJ) plays a robust conjecturer role of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) as compared to procedural justice (PJ). Analysis also showed that procedural justice (PJ) did not mediate the affiliation amongst corporate social responsibility (CSR), organizational citizenship behavior (OCB)                          It is recommended, workforce in developing economies countries like Pakistan has extra worried about equality in the distribution of incentives than procedural justice procedural justice(PJ).Hence, in such a context, specifically for developed countries like Pakistan, procedures are a less effective way to reduce undesirable significances on biased incentive distribution.